The Biggest Gaps and Opportunities in Services Procurement Jason Busch - July 2, 2015 8:43 AM | Categories: Services and Indirect Spend, Services Procurement & Contingent Labor, Services Procurement & Contingent Labor Management, Supply Chain, Survey | Tags: L2, Sourcing and Categories Spend Matters and the Institute for Supply Management have been hard at work surveying members and readers – along with the Society for Human Resource Management community – on the disconnect between the management of direct material supply chains and services supply chains, primarily centered on contingent labor. Today I’ll highlight some of the qualitative responses received from more than 450 participants, who offered their opinions on the biggest gaps and opportunities they perceived in managing services procurement today. You can find other posts in this series below, including response data suggesting best-of-breed vendor management system (VMS) and managed services provider (MSP) penetration is not as robust as many believe it is. But back to the subject at hand. When asked the question, “What are the biggest gaps/opportunities that you see in managing services spending and the extended workforce?” participants offered some of the following qualitative responses: Uncertainty regarding regulatory compliance and such as the Affordable Care Act, co-employment and misclassification Biggest gap: the organization’s unwillingness to take control of this huge expense and better manage it from all perspectives – cost, risk, worker classification, on/off boarding “We have a robust application tracking and managing all supply-side spend. We are focused on line-of-business needs and compliance to program as a means to optimize demand side cost.” Spend analysis, forecasting and demand planning is poor in case of services. Obtaining alignment with internal customers and buy-in from stakeholders “The biggest opportunity for us lies in using an MSP-VMS solution.” Reporting and tracking contingent workforce and benchmarking of rates for labor One of the central themes on both sides of the improvement and opportunities coin appears to be the effective use of quantitative information, including spend and supplier data. Of course the irony of this is all the top VMS providers – Fieldglass, IQNavigator, Beeline – offer analytics and integrated rate and related guidance as part of their solutions. But are companies using it effectively, let alone adopting these capabilities at the level they should? (The study found that only 22% of respondents uses a best of breed VMS solution.) What do you think? Feel free to chime in below! Related ArticlesCompanies Can’t Get No VMS Satisfaction: Exploring the HR Disconnect With Services Procurement TechnologyCXC Corporate Services Underscores Growing Need to Field and Manage Global Contract TalentBeeline Conference Wrap: Hacking the Contingent Workforce Supply ChainBeeline: Broader Services Procurement Game On(Force) First Voice Brian Hoffmeyer: 03.07.2015 at 11:56 am Interesting commentary. It’s astounding to me how difficult it is to get companies to capture all of their services spend in a VMS when the benefits are so incredibly clear. Reply Discuss this: Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.