GSK Prescribing Higher EPS through Procurement Cost Reductions

Among the big pharma companies, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is one of the most forward-thinking providers when it comes to procurement innovation and execution (more on this in a minute). Here at Spend Matters, we're lucky to count two former GSK procurement executives, Gregg Brandyberry and Jason Magidson, as contributors. Gregg formerly served as GSK's CPO and Jason was charged with driving innovation into procurement processes, technology investment and usage. The legacy of Gregg's and Jason's contributions -- along with that of countless others -- lives on in GSK's ability to deliver earnings results even an environment lacking new blockbusters.

According to GSK's most recent earnings report, net profit, before restructuring charges, was £1.27 billion or just over $2 billion in US dollars for the quarter ending 30 June. Factoring in restructuring charges, net profit still hit £1.11 billion, an impressive number. According to one source covering the latest quarterly performance, "Cost-cutting helped deliver bottom-line improvements, and that drive will continue. The company has already identified another £300 million worth of cuts to annual spending, bringing the restructuring savings to £2.5 billion a year. Plus, GSK is eying more cost reductions, some of which mimic Novartis' efficiency efforts, namely supply-chain and procurement efficiencies, and cash-conversion improvements."

Yet from the Spend Matters perspective, we'd argue that at least historically speaking, GSK has been at the same level (or potentially even ahead) of Novartis in certain areas of procurement and supplier management. A study we conducted in 2008, suggested that GSK along with Eli Lily, Johnson & Johnson, Merck and Pfizer were the most "Innovative" companies when it came to procurement and related technology adoption and returns. Abbott, Amgen and Novartis came up as "Early Adopters" on the same measurement scale, with over three dozen other companies falling into the Early Majority (e.g., AstraZeneca), Late Majority (e.g., Genzyme) and Laggard categories. Regardless, all the work that GSK has been driving for years in procurement is certainly paying off, with shareholders partaking in the benefits of previous and continuous investment.

Jason Busch

Share on Procurious

Discuss this:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.