What's Up With Legal Fee Negotiations?

Spend Matters welcomes a guest post from Danny Ertel of Vantage Partners.

A lot has been written about the death of the billable hour and the rise of new alternative billing arrangements (AFAs), with a recent survey reporting that 95% of all firms, and 100% of firms with over 250 lawyers, are using AFAs in some way, shape or form. But the percentage of revenue accounted for by AFAs remains low and two-thirds of the firms using AFAs acknowledge that they are doing so only reactively. And when they were not talking with clients about AFAs, many large firms have instead been offering clients discounts on their hourly rates, often substantial ones.

Why are so many law firms struggling with the way they negotiate fees with clients? The easy answer might be that the bargaining leverage has shifted, as law firms got caught with excess capacity during the recent economic downturn. But in my view, that shift in leverage explains why law firms are getting paid less, not why they are struggling with how they negotiate fees. Indeed, I would argue that law firms have always had a tough time negotiating with their clients. Prior to the downturn, when law firms were regularly raising their hourly rates by 6% or more each year, they were not really "negotiating" their fees so much as announcing them.

In my experience, many law firm partners, especially those at the larger firms, find it difficult to negotiate with clients about what they should be paid for their services. Some of the problem has to do with the assumptions about what it means to "negotiate" and the need for there to be winners and losers in any negotiation. Some of it has to do with fears about putting the relationship at risk by bargaining about rates. A not insignificant part of the problem is that few lawyers ever receive much training on professional service fee negotiations – because many firms don't consider such training relevant for associates and many partners find it embarrassing to acknowledge they might benefit from it. I suspect these negotiations even trigger identity issues for some law firm partners, who resent having to explain why they are worth what they charge. Whatever the combination of factors that conspire to make fee negotiations challenging, it has always struck me as odd that individuals who are otherwise great and effective negotiators, able to be creative in the solutions they craft and persuasive in how they present them to their counterparts when they are negotiating on behalf of their clients, seem to forget all of that when they negotiate with their clients. The best many come up with when clients push back on fees are some painful grimaces and an offer to knock their rates down a bit.

Click here to read the rest of this post over on my blog.

- Danny Ertel, Vantage Partners

Share on Procurious

First Voice

  1. Ken Hartman:

    Hourly rates are a terrible way to negotiate legal services. Even lawyers can figure out that if they cut their hourly rates, they have to bill an extra hour or two make it back. That’s why AFA’s, specifically fixed rates, are a good idea. The implied threat of course is that you can get cheap legal services or good legal services but not both. Is it worth losing a case by cheaping out on the law advice? I know it’s a standard sales technique but it is effective…

Discuss this:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.