Friday Rant: Will Oracle Go Shopping? Post Ariba/SAP Acquisition Strategy… (Part 1)

Last weekend, I chatted with sharedserviceslink's Susie West during her visit to Chicago. Her firm, a conference and community company focused on the shared services industry (especially accounts payable and P2P) held an event in Chicago. Susie herself is a blogger, and during her visit, we had the chance to catch up on the latest SAP/Ariba news, including trading thoughts on where the acquisition places Oracle. We both speculated that there are some deals that Oracle should consider, including OB10 and Transcepta, to even the e-invoicing, supplier enablement and network paying field with its Waldorf-based rival.

After Susie arrived back in the UK, I posted two comments on her blog (which at the time of this writing, appear to have been removed by accident during a site migration on their end). I'll repost them here, below. They were both in response to a comment by Luke McKeever (OB10's CEO) in response to Susie's suggestion that Oracle should buy OB10. Luke defended his firm's independent stance in his comment.

In the first comment, I suggested five quick thoughts regarding this acquisition suggestion (re: Oracle and OB10):

  1. Yes, this speculation is on people's minds. When I saw Susie yesterday during her trip to Chicago, we brought this up together, so Luke, there's two of us in sector who think this talk is worth sharing
  2. Oracle should buy OB10...but should buy Transcepta first -- another story entirely. For OB10, I would wait until the frothy multiples come back down to earth as Oracle needs basic supplier enablement capability and on-boarding in-house before volume over a network and broader network connectivity
  3. Any CEO who understands fiduciary responsibility to an independent board MUST evaluate offers at these current levels (Luke, I know you would agree with this). Historically, they are off the charts for SaaS/platform/connectivity
  4. Deals are being accelerated at the moment (in the past week) owing to SAP's take out of Ariba; I can attest to this in a number of situations I'm close to
  5. OB10 is one of the last remaining supplier e-invoicing network targets with material revenue and volume. The CEO is also a great guy (although he should cut Susie some slack); I know he also knows that being a desirable asset should not at all impact customer decisions -- new or renewals.

As for everyone else on the transactions side of the house: get some rest this weekend. It's going to be a hot, long summer.

The second comment I posted was more specific to challenge of getting non-financial deals done inside Oracle:

One last comment... Oracle would need an act of the Corp Dev G-Ds to do either deal. OB10 or Transcepta are both too small for anyone to get excited about internally at Oracle. The only reasons Oracle would ever do such a deal is because it went all the way up. Even though OB10 is larger than Transcepta, the two providers' revenue together is less than one of Larry's yachts -- the typical point at which something gets interesting for them. So don't think these two deals will happen just because from a solution architecture and strategy standpoint, they would make sense for Oracle. OB10 would need to be 3.5-5.5X its current size to be on the regular Oracle deal radar -- and Transcepta 10-13X its current size. That's probably a good thing...earlier today, I saw someone in Chicago with a t-shirt with a picture of the Death Star that read "I had friends on that ship." Enough from me...happy summer, everyone.

So if I'm right -- not about the Death Star, which was just a joke! -- it seems that Oracle should break with its typical financial deal focus and pick up Transcepta, a tiny bite, but a potentially important supplier enablement morsel to facilitate P2P connectivity. Moreover, the Oracle team would know exactly what it's getting itself into, based on their long-term partnership with Transcepta. On the topic of the other provider in question, it feels to me that OB10 would make some sense, but the combination of its relative small size (for a typical Oracle acquisition) and the fact that from a functional software standpoint, Transcepta in fact solves more challenges for them, such an acquisition feels less likely.

However, there are other assets in this sector that Oracle could pick up. Basware, for one, would give Oracle a range of customer assets as well as the makings of a potentially next generation platform (Alusta) that could be run externally from its own solutions to facilitate e-invoicing (and ultimately other P2P areas) on a next generation cloud-based architecture. It's also a deal that Oracle could justify based on Basware's revenue and valuation. Moreover, it would place Oracle in SAP's back yard in Europe, where Basware is strongest (albeit their influence is higher, the further North you head within the EU).

Beyond Basware, SciQuest is a potential acquisition outlier as well, even though they're not large enough to get the attention of Oracle's corporate development organization (moreover, there's a lot of product overlap in the broader P2P and supplier management areas). However, SciQuest's vertical-specific focus (life sciences, higher education, etc.) would fit with a common targeted industry buy-out theme that Oracle and others often subscribe to. And at the same time, SciQuest has lots of good stories to tell integrating into dozens of PeopleSoft and Oracle environments at some of their larger accounts.

There are potential acquisitions that could come out of left field for Oracle as well. But some of these are highly unlikely because they're in areas that Oracle simply does not understand. For example, with the GXS connectivity assets, Oracle could truly build a fascinating new business that could take on the SAP/Ariba network business head on. Still, such a move into the EDI and post-EDI connectivity, supplier enablement and supplier management space would be a huge leap for Oracle.

Are we missing anyone on the Oracle shopping list based on the typical Oracle acquisition criteria I explained earlier in this rant? If so, join the conversation.

- Jason Busch

Share on Procurious

Voices (15)

  1. Gary H:

    Jason – like I said, Oracle would have to step outside their comfort zone. I agree with you, it’ll never happen for the reasons you stated, and a few others. I also mentioned Infor…any opinion on that?

  2. where this is going:

    Oracle buying hubwoo, Basware etc… would still be cheaper than buying Ariba, even after a hefty investment in unifying and development funding. I think its a smart move except for what SAP reaction would be to their partners if they get bought. Then again SAP started this. Another option is for SAP to absorb their smaller partners. it will be some interesting weeks.

  3. Jason Busch:


    Oracle is not equipped, as standard operating procedure, to do a bunch of small deals rolled-up into a broader offering (or a single anchor deal with a bunch of tuck-ins). It’s just not in their historic deal focus/DNA. Given this operating limitation/focus, do you have any idea how much of a nightmare that would be for Oracle to try something new like this? It would be the equivalent of a lion hunting and eating 5 hamsters for dinner — miles apart from each other. I would not want to smell the other half of the digestion either … even if they were the cutest and best examples of the furry little pets before the first bite.

    This says nothing for the fact that it’s a fascinating (and potentially smart) suggestion …

  4. Gary H:

    Interesting thought…the Ariba Network was the key driver of the acquisition by SAP, correct? So why shouldn’t Oracle (or Infor) go outside their typical acquisition comfort zone and respond by buying and consolidating the supplier networks that best compete with the Ariba Network? Think about it everybody, if you consolidate Basware, SciQuest, Hubwoo, Wallmedien and Ketera/Rearden, I’m pretty sure you surpass the size of the Ariba network in both # of suppliers (with redundancies of course) and transacton volume (no redundancies here). As a bonus, you pick up about 700 customers (again, with redundancies) and maybe $200M in revenue. The interesting part? Many of these customers are SAP users, and many of the suppliers are non-US (especially with regard to Hubwoo, Wallmedien and Basware networks)…which is one of the known weaknesses of the Ariba network. Crazy idea? Yes, but who saw SAP buying Ariba…

  5. Anonymous:
  6. Anonymous:
  7. Slimer:

    @Jason. It is very interesting indeed. Though they might not acquire, I wonder how open they will be to partnerships with all of these smaller solution providers. And in turn, how would SAP react to their "partners" working with their competitor.

    SAP shouldn’t get very mad, as they have obviously picked who they want to dance with in the key areas.

  8. Roger Bass:

    Coupa and NetSuite? Cloud plays, more than connectivity, though Coupa does have a supplier network, and both have strong historical ties with Oracle. Taulia could be interesting, given their suddenly-less-comfortable position in the SAP ecosystem, even though they’re small. Maybe Tradeshift, though they don’t have much yet on the enterprise product side.

  9. where is this going:

    That is indeed the question =) – cant wait to see the outcome

  10. Jason Busch:

    @where this is going

    Now that is the $4B question (or maybe the $5B question ) !!

    – Jason

  11. where is this going:

    So if Hubwoo is not a fit based on size are OB10 and Transcepta better options? seems like the only real option is Ariba then… why not outbid SAP on Ariba?

  12. Jason Busch:

    Hubwoo does not fit Oracle’s acquisition criteria based on revenue. Extremely low probability they would even look at such a deal (even if it was a great fit) because of this.

    Moreover, SAP would react negatively (and in the near-term, at least, the Hubwoo relationship will remain important for SAP — Ariba is not a done deal, moreover there is no talk of integration roadmaps yet).

  13. Slimer:

    What about Hubwoo? I would be interested to know your thoughts on those possibilities and pros/cons of such a deal.

  14. jack, the po-flipper:

    I like the "name", ub 🙂

    More important, why Oracle did not do something here long ago is odd. Plain odd.

  15. ub-Invoicing:

    Both OB10 and Transcepta are magnifiers on the entire Oracle product portfolio — PSFT, eBusiness Suite, JDE, Fusion. Another argument in their camp …

Discuss this:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.