Transcepta: Vendor Analysis (Part 2) — Weaknesses, Competition and Recommendations
05/11/2016
Compared with other purchase-to-pay (P2P), e-invoicing and supplier network providers, Transcepta is a bit of an anomaly. Not only has it not raised significant capital to support sales and marketing expansion, it has remained focused (until recently) on supplier enablement, e-invoicing and document exchange/collaboration enablement rather than footprint expansion (e.g., e-procurement, trade financing, etc.). The largest tragedy of Transcepta (in our view) is that it doesn’t have the sales and marketing resources to get into more opportunities. In the first installment of this Spend Matters PRO series exploring Transcepta, we covered the provider’s corporate background, solution footprint and overall strengths. Part 2 provides insight into solution weaknesses, competition and customer and prospect recommendations.
-
Tradeshift has $240 million funding round, plans to restructure and focus on near-term profitability01/14/2020
-
P2P03/03/2025
-
AP/I2P04/27/2020
-
Debunking the Myths of Optical Character Recognition: What It Is and How It Affects Accounts Payable09/14/2018
-
AP/I2P EPRO12/12/2022
-
Tradeshift has $240 million funding round, plans to restructure and focus on near-term profitability01/14/2020
-
P2P03/03/2025
-
AP/I2P04/27/2020
-
Debunking the Myths of Optical Character Recognition: What It Is and How It Affects Accounts Payable09/14/2018
-
AP/I2P EPRO12/12/2022