Back to Hub

GEP: Vendor Analysis (Part 5) — Solution Weaknesses

09/10/2019 By

In Spend Matters’ previous installment of our seven-part GEP review, we called out some of the real strengths of the SMART by GEP platform, including some that are rare in the market today. In this Part 5, we are going to balance our analysis by also pointing out some of the "weaknesses" of the platform, at least against peers. (A weakness isn't a weakness unless you are looking for, or need, a certain capability, which, of course, you may already have in-house in another platform.)

While we may have hinted at these by way of omission of coverage in our solution overview in Part 3 and Part 4, we are going to get more specific so you understand precisely what isn't there (and can make a judgment call as to whether you even need the capability). We’ll look at deep optimization (especially logistics), asset management for direct, VMS, trade financing, T&E and more.

This article requires a paid membership that has access to AP Automation / Invoice-to-Pay, Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), E-Procurement, Procure-to-Pay, Source-to-Contract (S2C), Source-to-Pay (S2P), Sourcing, or Spend & Procurement Analytics.
Please log in or create an account to view this article