Back to Hub

Medius: P2P Vendor Analysis (Part 2) — Strengths and weaknesses, tech selection tips

08/08/2022 By

In this series on Medius' procure-to-pay (P2P) offering, Part 2 provides an assessment of the P2P solution’s strengths and weaknesses based on both quantitative data gathered through our SolutionMap benchmark and our analysts' informed qualitative analysis. It also offers tech selection tips.

To be able to compare P2P solutions in a fair way and from the same viewpoint, we at Spend Matters created SolutionMap, a benchmark tool that analyzes both the platform and the functional-level capabilities of the solutions, together with the analysis made by their own clients and that we (at Spend Matters) captured through a customer survey. This is how we identify strengths and weaknesses, which we detail here in Part 2.

This Spend Matters PRO Vendor Analysis series helps procurement organizations and the firms that support them evaluate Medius as it stands today.

Part 3 of today’s series will provide a detailed overview of each component of the Medius P2P product and a final analyst summary. Part 1 offers company background information, a company SWOT analysis and a list of Medius' competitors.

This article requires a paid membership that has access to AP Automation / Invoice-to-Pay or Procure-to-Pay.
Please log in or create an account to view this article
Vendor Analysis